Heard Of The Great Deepseek BS Theory? Here Is a Good Example > 자유게시판

본문 바로가기
  • 본 온라인 쇼핑몰은 유니온다오 회원과 유니온다오 협동조합 출자 조합원 만의 전용 쇼핑몰입니다.
  • 회원로그인

    아이디 비밀번호
  • 장바구니0
쇼핑몰 전체검색

Heard Of The Great Deepseek BS Theory? Here Is a Good Example

페이지 정보

profile_image
작성자 Odell De Lissa
댓글 0건 조회 114회 작성일 25-02-02 05:28

본문

Unsurprisingly, DeepSeek didn't present solutions to questions about sure political events. For questions that can be validated using specific guidelines, we adopt a rule-based mostly reward system to find out the suggestions. Conversely, for questions without a definitive ground-reality, corresponding to these involving artistic writing, the reward model is tasked with providing feedback based mostly on the question and the corresponding reply as inputs. Think you have solved question answering? For non-reasoning information, reminiscent of creative writing, position-play, and simple question answering, we make the most of deepseek ai china-V2.5 to generate responses and enlist human annotators to confirm the accuracy and correctness of the info. This methodology ensures that the ultimate training knowledge retains the strengths of DeepSeek-R1 while producing responses which are concise and efficient. In the present course of, we need to learn 128 BF16 activation values (the output of the earlier computation) from HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) for quantization, and the quantized FP8 values are then written again to HBM, solely to be learn once more for MMA. Current GPUs solely help per-tensor quantization, lacking the native support for positive-grained quantization like our tile- and block-clever quantization. For comparability, high-end GPUs like the Nvidia RTX 3090 boast nearly 930 GBps of bandwidth for his or her VRAM.


Coding is a challenging and sensible process for LLMs, encompassing engineering-focused tasks like SWE-Bench-Verified and Aider, in addition to algorithmic duties comparable to HumanEval and LiveCodeBench. On Arena-Hard, DeepSeek-V3 achieves an impressive win charge of over 86% towards the baseline GPT-4-0314, performing on par with top-tier models like Claude-Sonnet-3.5-1022. Under our training framework and infrastructures, coaching DeepSeek-V3 on every trillion tokens requires only 180K H800 GPU hours, which is much cheaper than coaching 72B or 405B dense fashions. It requires only 2.788M H800 GPU hours for its full training, together with pre-coaching, context length extension, and post-coaching. They do so much less for put up-coaching alignment right here than they do for Deepseek LLM. After all we're doing a little anthropomorphizing however the intuition here is as effectively founded as anything else. For closed-source fashions, evaluations are performed through their respective APIs. In Table 3, we compare the bottom mannequin of DeepSeek-V3 with the state-of-the-art open-supply base fashions, including DeepSeek-V2-Base (DeepSeek-AI, 2024c) (our previous launch), Qwen2.5 72B Base (Qwen, 2024b), and LLaMA-3.1 405B Base (AI@Meta, 2024b). We evaluate all these fashions with our internal evaluation framework, and make sure that they share the same analysis setting. To be particular, in our experiments with 1B MoE models, the validation losses are: 2.258 (using a sequence-sensible auxiliary loss), 2.253 (utilizing the auxiliary-loss-free methodology), and 2.253 (using a batch-smart auxiliary loss).


In addition, we carry out language-modeling-primarily based analysis for Pile-test and use Bits-Per-Byte (BPB) because the metric to guarantee fair comparability amongst fashions using different tokenizers. In addition, in contrast with DeepSeek-V2, the brand new pretokenizer introduces tokens that combine punctuations and line breaks. In addition, on GPQA-Diamond, a PhD-degree evaluation testbed, DeepSeek-V3 achieves outstanding outcomes, ranking simply behind Claude 3.5 Sonnet and outperforming all different rivals by a substantial margin. We adopt an identical approach to DeepSeek-V2 (DeepSeek-AI, 2024c) to enable lengthy context capabilities in DeepSeek-V3. Reinforcement studying. DeepSeek used a big-scale reinforcement studying method focused on reasoning tasks. This strategy not solely aligns the mannequin more carefully with human preferences but in addition enhances efficiency on benchmarks, especially in situations where obtainable SFT information are limited. Their hyper-parameters to regulate the power of auxiliary losses are the identical as DeepSeek-V2-Lite and ديب سيك DeepSeek-V2, respectively. Ideally this is similar because the mannequin sequence length. As illustrated in Figure 9, we observe that the auxiliary-loss-free model demonstrates better expert specialization patterns as expected. DeepSeek-V3 demonstrates aggressive efficiency, standing on par with top-tier fashions comparable to LLaMA-3.1-405B, GPT-4o, and Claude-Sonnet 3.5, while considerably outperforming Qwen2.5 72B. Moreover, DeepSeek-V3 excels in MMLU-Pro, a extra difficult educational knowledge benchmark, where it carefully trails Claude-Sonnet 3.5. On MMLU-Redux, a refined version of MMLU with corrected labels, DeepSeek-V3 surpasses its peers.


Moreover, utilizing SMs for communication results in significant inefficiencies, as tensor cores stay fully -utilized. When using vLLM as a server, pass the --quantization awq parameter. To facilitate the environment friendly execution of our model, we offer a dedicated vllm resolution that optimizes performance for operating our mannequin successfully. The effectiveness demonstrated in these particular areas indicates that lengthy-CoT distillation could possibly be helpful for enhancing mannequin performance in other cognitive tasks requiring advanced reasoning. Table 9 demonstrates the effectiveness of the distillation data, displaying significant improvements in both LiveCodeBench and MATH-500 benchmarks. As illustrated, DeepSeek-V2 demonstrates appreciable proficiency in LiveCodeBench, reaching a Pass@1 rating that surpasses several other refined fashions. On FRAMES, a benchmark requiring question-answering over 100k token contexts, DeepSeek-V3 intently trails GPT-4o whereas outperforming all different fashions by a significant margin. However, this trick could introduce the token boundary bias (Lundberg, 2023) when the mannequin processes multi-line prompts without terminal line breaks, significantly for few-shot analysis prompts. • We'll discover extra complete and multi-dimensional mannequin analysis methods to forestall the tendency in direction of optimizing a hard and fast set of benchmarks during research, which may create a misleading impression of the mannequin capabilities and have an effect on our foundational evaluation. Remember to set RoPE scaling to 4 for correct output, extra dialogue could possibly be discovered in this PR.



If you liked this short article and you would like to get far more information relating to ديب سيك kindly pay a visit to the web-site.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

회사명 유니온다오협동조합 주소 서울특별시 강남구 선릉로91길 18, 동현빌딩 10층 (역삼동)
사업자 등록번호 708-81-03003 대표 김장수 전화 010-2844-7572 팩스 0504-323-9511
통신판매업신고번호 2023-서울강남-04020호 개인정보 보호책임자 김장수

Copyright © 2001-2019 유니온다오협동조합. All Rights Reserved.